Layers sells a whole marketing department - ads, App Store listing work, human creators, install attribution. Topped sells one loop: find a creator's post that landed, make your version, prove whether it worked. At the same $49 the real question is scope, and whether you can see what each action costs before you spend it.
Facts checked 2 August 2026
Of every product in this category, Layers is aimed at the closest thing to our own reader. Their own site names mobile apps, technical founders without marketing teams, and "products whose builders would rather be coding". So does ours. Both products read something you already have to get started - Layers reads your GitHub commits and releases, Topped reads your App Store listing or your site - and both refuse to publish anything without you approving it first.
The honest difference is scope, and it is large. Layers runs paid media across Meta, TikTok, OpenAI, Apple Search Ads and Google Ads, rewrites and ships your App Store listing, recruits and pays contracted human creators, and offers an SDK that ties installs and revenue back to the post that drove them. Topped does none of those things. We make short-form organic content, publish it to three platforms, and try to prove whether it worked.
The second difference is what each product tells you before you spend. Layers publishes a monthly credit amount per plan - 1,000, 3,000, 15,000 - and their FAQ explains that credits meter the work agents do. What no page on their public site publishes is what any single action costs: not a slideshow, not a video, not a campaign. Topped puts the exact credit price on the button before you click it, tops up at a flat $0.02 a credit, and states plainly that the monthly grant resets each cycle. Those are different philosophies about the same problem, and you should know which one you are buying.
Layers figures were read from their pricing page, product pages, terms and their own published llms-full.txt on 2 August 2026. Note that their pricing page opens on the annual tab, so the headline numbers there are $15/$39/$159 - the month-to-month prices are $19/$49/$199, as published in their own llms-full.txt. Prices move; check theirs before you decide.
| Topped | Layers | |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $49 (Plus) | $49 (Pro) |
| Annual price | $37/mo - 25% off | $39/mo - about 20% off |
| AI credits included | 800 | 3,000 |
| What one action costs | The exact credit price is on the button before you click it | Not published - plan amounts only |
| Extra credits | $0.02 each, flat at every pack size, never expire | No top-up price published |
| Unused credits | Monthly grant resets each cycle; purchased credits never expire | No expiry policy published |
| Publishing platforms | TikTok, Instagram, YouTube Shorts | TikTok and Instagram |
| Whose accounts you post from | Accounts you already own. That is the only option we offer. | Accounts you own, or managed accounts their operators run for you, fronted by generated influencers |
| How volume is limited | 100 content saves a month; 10 connected accounts | No published cap on posts or accounts - metered by credits, 3 brand projects and 3 seats |
| Install attribution | Not offered | SDK across seven app platforms, with SKAN on iOS and install-referrer on Android |
| Paid ads, App Store listing work, human creators | Not offered | Ads and listing work included; managed human creator programs listed on their $199 plan |
| Why a post is suggested to you | Another creator's real post, named and dated on the card with the number it got | Trend and competitor research feeding content generation |
| How your own posts are judged | The real platform numbers for your own posts - the full Scoreboard, on every plan including free | Performance reporting on connected accounts, inside a much wider marketing suite |
| Free tier | A real recurring plan: 3 content saves a month, 80 one-time credits, 1 connected account | Free onboarding, strategy and first content, no card - amount not published |
| Driving it from your own tools | Not offered - the Agent lives inside the product | MCP server and REST API; their pricing page lists API access and webhooks on the $199 plan |
This is the sharpest difference between the two products and it is worth being precise about, because it is not an accusation of bad faith. Layers publishes generous credit amounts - 1,000, 3,000 and 15,000 a month - and their pricing page states that bigger plans price each credit lower, at 14% on Pro and 30% on Scale. The arithmetic on those figures is honest and checks out. What is missing is the other half: across every page on their public site, nothing states what generating one video, one slideshow or one campaign actually spends. Without that number the credit amount cannot be turned into a cost per post, so you cannot work out what a month of posting costs until you are inside and already paying. Topped's answer is the opposite habit: the exact price appears on every generate button before the click, top-ups are a flat $0.02 a credit at every pack size, and the monthly grant simply resets at the next cycle - no fine print to track.
Layers offers both, and says so plainly on their social product page: connect the accounts you already run, or post through a managed fleet they operate for you, fronted by generated influencers, with one strategy fanning out across the fleet. Their pricing page lists managed social distribution on the $49 plan. That is a legitimate product decision and plenty of founders will want it - but it is a fork in the road, and it is worth noticing which side you are standing on. Topped only publishes to accounts you already own. We do not sell, rent, warm or operate accounts, and we are not planning to. When you stop paying us, the accounts, the audience and the posts are still yours, because they always were.
Plenty of comparison pages would claim that everyone else shows raw view counts. So does Layers, and so do we - a real number a platform reported is the honest thing to show. The real difference is where evidence sits in the flow. For Layers it is measurement: it tells you how your post did after you published it. For Topped it is also the reason the post exists - most of what reaches your For You feed starts from a real post on the shelf our team hand-picks, and the card carries that post, its number, the account it came from and the date, before you approve anything. You can disagree with the suggestion. You can always see what it rests on.
At $49 you are not really choosing between two versions of the same product. Layers is buying you breadth: organic posting, comment replies drafted in your voice, paid media across five ad platforms, App Store listing changes shipped through App Store Connect, contracted human creators, and revenue attribution wired back through an SDK. Topped is buying you one loop done carefully - start from a real post our team put on the shelf, make your version as a Slideshow or Wall of text, publish it to your own accounts, and check the Scoreboard. If your problem is that nobody is running any of your marketing, breadth is genuinely the right purchase. If your problem is that you cannot tell which posts are working and why, a wider product does not solve it.
A small point, but a concrete one, and it runs the other way from most of this table. Layers' terms and connections page both describe organic publishing to Instagram and TikTok. Topped publishes to TikTok, Instagram and YouTube Shorts. If Shorts is part of how you reach people, that is a gap you would have to fill by hand. It is also the whole of our list - see below.
The scan is free and takes about a minute. No card, and nothing published until you approve it.
Sources: Layers pricing · Layers - llms-full.txt · Layers - Social · Layers - Connections · Layers - Measurement · Layers terms · Topped pricing